|
The Valetta Convention was originally signed at Valetta, in Malta,
in January 1992. It is a Convention, not of the EU, but of the
Council of Europe, a body that preceded the EU, but still exists
to deal mainly with cultural affairs.
However for long the British Government for long refused to sign
the Convention, mainly because of Article 3.
Article 3 reads:
| '
each party undertakes
to apply procedures
for the authorisation and supervision of excavation and other
archaeological activities in such a way as
to ensure
that excavations and other potentially destructive techniques
are carried out only by qualified, specially authorised persons
to subject to specific prior authorisation, the use
of metal detectors and any other detection equipment or process
for archaeological investigation'. |
This is a remarkable comprehensive statement, calling not only
for the licensing of excavations, but also for the specific authorisation
of excavators. It also bans not only metal detectors, but also
all geophysical surveying equipment. Because of this, the British
government has hitherto refrained from signing the convention.
However in March 2001, the government, without any warning, suddenly
signed up to document with the full support of English Heritage
which said it would take the lead in championing the Convention.
This is not yet law: it is, as English Heritage points out, only
an advocacy document. There is therefore still time
for a full debate on the principles enshrined in Article 3.
This website therefore has been set up to provide information
about the Valetta Convention and its implications. There is the
full Text of the Convention, and
of the Explanatory Report
that was published with it. There is also the text of the English
Heritage Press Release setting out the official English Heritage
position.
At the same time the Council for Independent Archaeology has taken
the lead in debating the Convention and its implications, and
has published an Open Letter to the Government
in Defence of Archaeology, which you invited to support
by email. There is also a discussion of some of the wider
implications of Valletta, and an FAQ looking
at some of the points to be debated.
|